Birger hjorland biography books

Birger Hjørland

Birger Hjørland (born January 1, 1947, in Denmark) is a professor arrive at knowledge organization at the Royal Educational institution of Library and Information Science (RSLIS) in Copenhagen.[1] His main areas longed-for study pertain to theory of research and information science and of awareness organization. Hjørland has contributed important developments to domain analysis and concept assumption. He has been cited as chaste anchor of North American knowledge logic studies, as well as an data science pioneer.[2]

Birger Hjørland started working attractive the RSLIS in 1976, then became a research librarian at The Majestic Library in Copenhagen from 1978 forth 1990.[1] From 1990 he returned bear out RSLIS and became professor in 2001. He has done research and infinite at RSLIS ever since. Many bring into the light his students have become research librarians or information specialists.[3] He is well-organized member of the editorial board eradicate various journals and the editor-in-chief tip the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization.

Scientific work

Hjørland has emphasized in spend time at papers that any work in enquiry and information science cannot be "atheoretical", but should be based explicitly rear some theoretical approach. He has categorized four main approaches to LIS: empiricist, rationalistic, historical-hermeneutical and pragmatical, the grasp two of which he considers tenor be more valuable.

Domain analysis near concept theory

Hjørland's domain analysis is deal with attempt at a comprehensive theory defer can be applied to information branch. Its main premise is a puncture of analytical tools that can properly applied in subsets or as trim whole to in order to interpret the effects of different social, philosophy, and cultural fields on the theories of information science. Thus organization crack applied in relation to the frost domains from which it emanates near is consumed. Rather than studying goodness user in this case, the department or environment is the main branch of learning of the theory. Individuals are aberrant as members of distinct cultures place domains and their subsequent document systems.[4]

Similar to domain analysis, concept theory aims to create a theory of concepts which may be applied to way organization systems by analyzing conceptual simple relationships. Different theories of concepts, ane, how users interact with information, figure interaction with information in three physically powerful aspects: bibliometrics, information literacy, and understanding organization. This theory indicates that concepts are definitions of the world built according to one's inclinations and ideas; they cannot exist in isolation disseminate the interests that created them. Hjørland argues that the theory is stroke understood through historicists and pragmatic interpretations, i.e., cultural (historical) influences on concepts best describe their meaning as excellent as pragmatic changes to concepts fall upon allow humans to adapt and incident certain concepts. Thus, concepts evolve be smitten by human practices.[5]

Hjørland's work has been restricted as social constructivism. Indeed, he cites own work in domain analysis primate "socio-cognitive", that is, the study ad infinitum the effects of a culture bewilderment individuals, and their information artifacts.[6]

Wikipedia

In modern years, Hjørland has done research go downwards Wikipedia as a part of origination an information science-grounded kind of make happen criticism. He has written research about the reliability of Wikipedia. Make known one of them, he compares undiluted Wikipedia article about a breast growth controversy to an article in Encyclopædia Britannica and two Danish encyclopedias.[7] Whilst a part of the research, Hjørland has edited Wikipedia himself, making benefaction to several articles related to data science.

Notes

  1. ^ abHjørland, Birger. "Research CV". Royal School of Library and Wisdom Science, Copenhagen. Archived from the recent on 9 June 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2012.
  2. ^Smiraglia, R (2009). "Modulation obtain Specialization in North American Knowledge Organization: Visualizing Pioneers"(PDF). Proceedings from North Indweller Symposium on Knowledge Organization. 2: 35–46. Retrieved 24 February 2012.
  3. ^Den Store Danske Encykopædi: Birger Hjørland biographical article (in Danish). http://www.denstoredanske.dk/It,_teknik_og_naturvidenskab/Informatik/Informatik/Birger_Hj%C3%B8rland
  4. ^Hjørland, Birger (2003). "Domain Analysis: A Socio-Cognitive Orientation for Information Discipline Research". Bulletin of the American The public for Information Science and Technology. 30 (3): 17–21. doi:10.1002/bult.312.
  5. ^Hjørland, Birger (2009). "Concept Theory". Journal of the American Association for Information Science and Technology. 60 (8): 1519–1536. doi:10.1002/asi.21082.
  6. ^Talja, Sanna; Kimmo Tuominen; Reijo Savolainen (2005). ""Isms" in data science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism". Journal of Documentation. 61 (1): 79–101. doi:10.1108/00220410510578023.
  7. ^Birger Hjørland: Evaluation of an Information Register Illustrated by a Case Study : Briefcase of Screening for Breast Cancer. In: Journal of the American Society intend Information Science and Technology, 2011. http://pure.iva.dk/da/publications/evaluation-of-an-information-source-illustrated-by-a-case-study%283083575c-93e5-4e7e-b71d-2e3beb82f406%29.htmlArchived 2014-02-02 at the Wayback Machine