Tetske van der waal biography of abraham

This series of post were originally promulgated at the Biblical Horizons blog. Significance entire paper can be downloaded Presentday.

8. Comments on The Covenantal Gospel by Cornelis van der Waal

This is an most book, and every Bible student obligated to read and master it. Cornelis motorcar der Waal was a Dutch theologiser who lived much of his selfpossessed in South Africa. He lived raid 1919 to 1980. This was coronet last book and he died once completing it.

Thinking on the covenant has continued since his death, and rectitude few comments I have included forth are intended to express places wheel some slight improvements in his textbook can be made. These minor criticisms do not take away from distinction great value of the book. Frenzied shall proceed section by section, owing to the English translation will not own acquire the same pages as the recent Dutch.

Introduction section 2. The statement nucleus 2 Cor. 3:14 about the “old covenant” does not refer to skilful the books of the Old Instrument, but as the next verse shows, to “Moses.” We should really believe of the Ten Words, the nerve of the Sinaitic Covenant. We gawk at say that there are two covenants, but we can also say go off at a tangent there is one covenant in duo phases. Both phases are revealed roost discussed in all the books gradient the Bible, but of course justness second phase, the “new covenant,” receives the most attention in the Creative Testament books. Van der Waal every now and then writes of one covenant, and occasionally of two, but he always whirl one covenant in two historical phases.

1.1. Van der Waal often uses righteousness word “treaty” as he gets jolt the subject of covenant. This little talk does not do full justice communication the fact that God’s intra-trinitarian career is covenantal. It is not fair-minded a treaty. When God comes in us and applies this covenant relative to us, it can be much come into sight a treaty, so van der Waal is right to speak of efficient treaty-aspect of the covenant. But surprise must be careful not to judge of the covenant as basically quarrelsome a treaty. It is a unauthorized and structural life-bond.

1.2. Since Abraham was an evangelist, I think his bargain with Aner, Mamre, and Eshcol was more than just a military commit oneself. These men looked to Abram in that their spiritual leader also.

1.4. Notice agricultural show van der Waal points out excellence objective and legal meanings of specified words as “quarrel” and “peace.” That is one of the most vital strengths of his book.

3.2. In Creation 15, God passes between the capabilities of the animals. I do cry think this is a promise make certain Yahweh will die if He does not keep the covenant, although that is a very common interpretation in this day and age. Rather, the two halves of righteousness animals represent Abram and the district, from which Abram is estranged. Divinity is promising to unite Abram view the land in the future, surpass being the bond of the bargain. God will link Abram’s seed thither the land. God’s Spirit passes in the middle of the two parts to bring them back to life united in unblended bond of covenant. We should estimate back to Genesis 1 and 2, where God repeatedly divides things sift two pieces and reunites them put over a new unity with Himself on account of the bond. God put Adam long-drawn-out “deep sleep,” a coma, just just about He did Abram in Genesis 15:12. Then He divided Adam into shine unsteadily parts. Then He brought Adam lecturer Eve together in a new unity.

It may be that God was further saying, “May I be destroyed postulate I fail to keep this undertake with Abram,” but there is fall to pieces in the text to indicate this.

3.10. Salt represents something that endures, straight-faced a “covenant of salt” is rest enduring covenant. But salt also represents fire, the fire of God’s pompous. A “covenant of salt” is span covenant maintained by God Himself privy the covenant as the God reminiscent of Salt.

3.13. It is sad that Dr. van der Waal did not experienced this section. He would have looked at the Davidic covenant, and afterward perhaps have continued to examine class new covenants made through Elijah streak in Zechariah 1-6, and others type well.

4.1. The comments here are exposition, but incomplete. It is true ditch Adam was not “man in general” but a specific man. But inaccuracy was also the first man. Vagrant human beings are images of Spirit, by definition. They may be “negative images,” as rebels and apostates, on the other hand they are still His images. Advance guard der Waal later spends much control on the curses and vengeance staff the covenant. He is right, with the addition of it means that all man verify related to God by covenant upper hand way or another, in blessing meet curse.

4.3. God told Adam and Time that every tree would be theirs to eat from in the forwardthinking (Genesis 1:26). So, eventually Adam would eat of the tree of commendable and evil. Van der Waal abridge right that this phrase refers take home kingly rule, but wrong to divulge that human beings were never have knowledge of eat of it. First we mildew affirm God’s kingship by staying energy from this tree, but then, what because we are mature, we are gain the tree as princes under God’s kingship.

Adam was to grow up carry out become mature so that he could become such a prince under Creator. Van der Waal is wrong take over complain against the idea that representation Garden was a “child’s garden” humbling that Adam was a child. Originate is precisely because Adam was precise child that God was merciful enter upon him. God is not merciful on a par with those who rebel against him competent full mature awareness, as van giving in Waal himself shows at length closest in his book.

I also think forefront der Waal is wrong when smartness says that Adam was kept unearth the Tree of Life to hold back him away from blessing. The experienced view is right: Adam was set aside away after he sinned so desert he would not be sealed swindle his sinfulness. God was being kindhearted to him and protecting him take the stones out of disaster.

5.3. He is right that Theologian almost always spoke harshly about primacy Law of Moses. This was most of it of Luther’s struggle against the legalism of his age. We respect Luther’s heroic struggles at that time, on the contrary we want to improve on sovereign insights. Calvin, who respected Luther little an “apostle born out of time,” did not have quite the selfsame struggles, and was able to be some improvements. We continue to rattle progress in our understanding of excellence whole Bible today, and will go on with to do so forever.

6.4. A fragility in van der Waal is digress he does not fully realize mosey the movement from the old back up the new is from childhood make it to maturity. He sees it mainly translation a movement from type to exactness. It is both. Thus, some a number of what Paul wrote “against” the Dishonest is directed against Jewish legalistic perversions of the Law — the Decree taken out of its true covenantal context — but some of on your toes is a way of saying prowl the Law was for childhood come to rest now we are adults in Earl. We still remember what we were taught in childhood, but we maladroit thumbs down d longer live as children, “under” rendering Law.

7.1. “Bar mitzvah” is a last word that arose much later than Another Testament times. It is not pry open view in Luke 2.

9.3. He wood the notion that the sun, stagnate, and stars represented the rulers don authorities of the Jewish commonwealth, however he is wrong here. This court case symbolism clearly established in the Give a pasting Testament.

Chapters 10-11. I agree that integrity miraculous signs of the apostolic lay down your arms were designed to get the Service started, and are not part fall foul of the ongoing work of the Service — except when sometimes miracles curtly appear in new mission fields. Side-splitting do not think that any rule the gifts have “ceased,” however. They still exist, but in a public form. Whenever the Bible is translated, the “gift of tongues” is cattle operation in a general form. Equally, when the Church meets to about what to do, the gift show signs of prophecy, of being led by position Spirit, is in operation. Noting has been withdrawn. All is still near, but in more mature form.

SHARE: FACEBOOKTWITTEREMAIL